Comparison

Astraea vs. Hill Research (TriClick)

Hill Research is an AI-augmented biostatistics CRO whose TriClick platform produces SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs. Astraea automates everything after protocol and raw data — SAP, eCRFs, TFLs and their shells, SDTM and ADaM datasets, Define-XML, and QC — deployed inside your own environment, where your data never leaves your systems.

What is Astraea?

Astraea is clinical trial automation software that pharmaceutical sponsors run themselves — not a CRO, and not a web-hosted service. It automates everything after protocol design and raw data collection: the SAP, eCRFs, TFLs, SDTM and ADaM datasets, Define-XML, QC, and the full set of FDA submission documents, in one auditable system. Because forward-deployed engineers install it inside the sponsor's own environment, Astraea never sees or holds your data. It is backed by Y Combinator (P26) and works across oncology, rare disease, other therapeutic areas, and medical devices.

The verdict

Hill Research is the right choice for teams that want an AI-augmented services partner — embedded biostatisticians and programmers who deliver SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs with TriClick. Astraea is the right choice for teams that want everything after protocol and raw data automated in one auditable system — SAP, eCRFs, TFLs and their shells, datasets, Define-XML, and QC — deployed inside their own environment, where Astraea never sees their data, with predictable pricing instead of per-table credits. Astraea is software sponsors run to control their own trials — not a CRO that runs them for you.

Side by side

How Astraea compares to TriClick.

Both use AI to generate datasets. The difference is scope: one end-to-end pipeline deployed in your environment versus SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs delivered with CRO and FSP services.

CriterionAstraeaHill Research (TriClick)
Automates everything after protocol & raw data
YesSAP, eCRFs, TFLs, SDTM/ADaM, Define-XML, QC, documents — one system
PartialOutputs are limited to SDTM, ADaM, and TFL datasets
Generates SDTM & ADaM datasets from raw data
YesDataset generation is core to the pipeline
YesProduces SDTM and ADaM datasets
Generates TFL outputs (tables, figures, listings)
YesGenerated in the same flow as the datasets
YesProduces TFL outputs
Generates TFL shells
YesProduces the TFL shells, not just the populated outputs
NoProduces TFL outputs only — not the shells
Generates SAP, eCRFs, Define-XML & submission documents
YesGenerates the SAP, eCRFs, Define-XML, and submission documents automatically
NoNot part of TriClick's outputs
Agentic AI automation
YesAgentic execution across the full pipeline
YesMultiple task-specific AI agents
Human-in-the-loop control
YesNamed-reviewer sign-off on every output
YesAI paired with embedded biostatisticians
Deployed in your environment (data never leaves)
YesInstalled in your systems by forward-deployed engineers; Astraea never sees your data
PartialCloud-based platform; data processed in the vendor environment
Auditability & 21 CFR Part 11
YesFull lineage, versioning, audit-ready by construction
YesAudit trails, 21 CFR Part 11 / GxP alignment
Therapeutic & indication coverage
YesClients across oncology, rare disease, other indications, and devices
YesCross-indication biostatistics experience
Pricing model
YesPlatform pricing — predictable across the pipeline
PartialSelf-serve metered by per-table credits; team pricing via sales
Full-service regulatory & medical-writing breadth
NoFocused on the automation pipeline, not full CRO services
YesDMC/DSMB support, medical writing, publications, human accountability

Where Hill Research wins

What Hill Research and TriClick do best.

AI-augmented CRO & FSP services

Hill Research pairs TriClick with embedded biostatisticians and programmers. Teams that want people accountable for delivery — not just software — get a services partner with automation built in.

Self-serve dataset outputs you can trial

TriClick produces SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs and is available self-serve, so a programmer can test dataset and table generation before any procurement conversation.

Full regulatory breadth

Beyond the automation itself, Hill Research offers SAP consulting, DMC/DSMB support, medical writing, and publications as a services partner. Teams that want a CRO to run those functions — not just software — get that breadth from Hill Research.

Where Astraea wins

One pipeline, in your environment.

01 · The whole chain, not just outputs

Everything after protocol and raw data, in one system.

TriClick produces SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs — not the TFL shells, and not the SAP, eCRFs, Define-XML, or submission documents. Astraea generates the SAP, eCRFs, TFLs and their shells, SDTM and ADaM datasets, Define-XML, and QC end to end in one auditable system, so every output is produced and traced together.

02 · Predictable pricing

Platform pricing, not per-table credits.

TriClick's self-serve plans meter usage in per-table credits, with team pricing handled through sales. Astraea is priced as a platform that covers the pipeline, so cost does not scale unpredictably with the number of tables a study generates.

03 · Deployed in your environment

Your data never leaves your systems.

Astraea is not a web-hosted service. Forward-deployed engineers integrate it into your own environment and work alongside your team, and Astraea never sees your data. It is software your team runs to create and control your own trials — not a CRO or FSP that runs them for you — with named-reviewer sign-off on every output.

FAQ

Astraea vs. TriClick, answered.

The questions biometrics and biostatistics leads ask most when weighing a single end-to-end pipeline against task tools delivered with services.

Astraea vs. Hill Research (TriClick) — Common Questions

Is Astraea better than Hill Research's TriClick?
Astraea is better for teams that want everything after protocol and raw data automated in one auditable system, deployed inside their own environment. Hill Research's TriClick is better for teams that want SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs delivered alongside CRO and FSP services with embedded biostatisticians. The right choice depends on whether you want a single end-to-end pipeline or dataset outputs plus services.
What is the difference between Astraea and TriClick?
TriClick is Hill Research's AI platform, and in practice its outputs are SDTM, ADaM, and TFL datasets — it does not generate TFL shells, the SAP, eCRFs, Define-XML, or submission documents. Astraea automates everything after protocol and raw data — generating the SAP, eCRFs, TFLs and their shells, SDTM and ADaM datasets, Define-XML, and QC in one auditable system that forward-deployed engineers install inside your own environment, where Astraea never sees your data.
Is Astraea cheaper than TriClick?
The models differ. TriClick's self-serve plans are metered by per-table credits, ranging from about $79 to $799 per month for 10 to 120 table credits, with team and enterprise pricing handled through sales. Astraea is priced as a platform covering the whole pipeline, so cost does not scale per table. Total cost depends on study volume and scope.
Can Astraea replace TriClick?
Astraea can replace TriClick for end-to-end automation — generating the SAP, eCRFs, SDTM and ADaM datasets, TFLs and their shells, and Define-XML, and running conformance QC in one system deployed in your own environment. Where TriClick's outputs stop at SDTM, ADaM, and TFL datasets, Astraea covers the full chain. It does not provide Hill Research's surrounding CRO and FSP services such as medical writing or DMC support.
Who should use Hill Research instead of Astraea?
Teams that want an AI-augmented services partner — embedded biostatisticians and programmers accountable for delivery, plus regulatory and medical-writing breadth — should consider Hill Research. Teams that only need SDTM, ADaM, and TFL outputs may also start with TriClick self-serve. Astraea is a platform focused on automating the whole pipeline inside your environment.

See months of biometrics work compressed into days.

Astraea automates everything after protocol and raw data — SAP, eCRFs, TFLs, datasets, Define-XML, and QC — in one auditable system, deployed inside your environment where your data never leaves, with statisticians in control of every decision.